Transformation

To explain his decision to seek the presidency so early in his political career, Barack Obama makes the case that more time in Washington could cause him to become jaded and lose his commitment to his principles. While this is surely a convenient rhetorical justification for a calculated political decision, there is a living embodiment of his argument: Hillary Clinton.

It is easy to forget that the Clintons were not always the establishment juggernaut of the present day. They began their odyssey as idealists determined to challenge the entrenched system and change the nature of American politics. Sound familiar?

The vibrant young leader who dared to speak out against a foolish war, worked to uncover a corrupt administration, and hoped to build an issue-focused “politics of tomorrow” has slowly morphed into her opposite: a powerful, win-at-all-cost politician who epitomizes the system she once vowed to transform.

Somewhere, deep down, it must break her heart to hear Obama speak out with the passion and vision she once possessed.

A Winning Ticket?

Much of the televised analysis following last night’s refreshingly civil and issue-focused Democratic debate between Senators Obama and Clinton centered on the possibility of the two candidates joining forces as running mates. While it is an intriguing possibility, it is likely only if Clinton is the presidential nominee. Obama would be wise to look elsewhere to balance his ticket.

Clinton’s support comes from true-blue liberals, proud feminists, and the traditional Democratic Party establishment—not enough to win in November. Should she capture the nomination, she will desperately need to court the independents, first-time voters, and even Republicans that back Obama. Without him, independents and Republicans will undoubtedly drift toward John McCain, and previously energized newcomers are likely to stay home.

By contrast, if Obama is the nominee, he will probably gain the support of Clinton’s voters automatically. Her base is extremely unlikely to vote Republican, and probably will support any Democratic nominee to prevent a Republican victory. Obama’s biggest perceived weakness is experience, particularly in foreign policy and military affairs. In a running mate, he would look for gravitas and an established track record on military issues. Perhaps a General, a long-serving member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, or even a purple state governor with service experience would fit the bill.